tackle whore wrote:
Has I indiciated Ethics and Law are two different things and both have changed over the years.
If we go to big pharmaceutical companys then the issue is even more enigmatic, generic manufacturers copying is there to stay and they don't change or improve the formula.
I think none of us in this forum would say it's un-ethichal the generic copy of medicine products.
I also think copyright laws have been used over the years by developed countrys to maintaing the "gap" with underdeveloped ones.
Where do we cross a line on the general access to the public versus individual property blocking by target marketing high pricing on products?
Some years protection to allow payment of investigation & research cost ? Or forget the general good and keep it locked forever ?
Just open up when there is "genuine public intrest" like in AIDS medicine ? Who is going to decide about the "genuine public intrest" ?
P.S. - Hope I managed to put in understandable English my questions.
Microsoft allways copyed other companys and we are all using and buying from them.....komodo poppers are copied by 6 companies- still trying to get you original ones fedu . carpenter,fisherman,evergreen,smith, sevenseas,yozuri, are all copied by international companies, see there is a guy copying orions again in australia at the moment.
Has I indiciated Ethics and Law are two different things and both have changed over the years.
If we go to big pharmaceutical companys then the issue is even more enigmatic, generic manufacturers copying is there to stay and they don't change or improve the formula.
I think none of us in this forum would say it's un-ethichal the generic copy of medicine products.
I also think copyright laws have been used over the years by developed countrys to maintaing the "gap" with underdeveloped ones.
Where do we cross a line on the general access to the public versus individual property blocking by target marketing high pricing on products?
Some years protection to allow payment of investigation & research cost ? Or forget the general good and keep it locked forever ?
Just open up when there is "genuine public intrest" like in AIDS medicine ? Who is going to decide about the "genuine public intrest" ?
P.S. - Hope I managed to put in understandable English my questions.