what does the evidence tell you?? Shepherd
- Thread starter Sea-Shepherd
- Start date
You see, the problem is that (as I see it) SS should have posted this in the Conservation and ethics sub-forum. Questions were asked if the person transgressed the law. In this case we know that he did not. If the guy's approach was wrong, Sealine Admin would have stepped in. So SS did nothing wrong and made a mistake. So what. The issue is quite simply that you have a few keyboard bitches that band together to try to degrade someone else because they don't share your opinions? Sure, that is who you are, you see SS as an easy target and off you go with your fellow bitches.
Interestingly, the angler (Chuck), has shrugged his shoulders and carried on, which shows that he is the bigger man. But what I see is some small minded guys that demand an apology for something that never even related to them. So, the apology comes and I'll give it to SS, most of you would not have manned up and apologised. So he did. But then, like a R20 hooker, you guys moan and moan like someone stole your lipstick! Jeez. You continue to attack the guy because the apology was not good enough. You want to humiliate him at all costs. Sealine belongs to everyone, not just to a select few and the site has an Admin that manages it.
Instead you guys resort to persecuting the man. (Persecution: systematic mistreatment of an individual by another individual or group - because I know most of you moaning old goats would not know what the word means). The fact is that this kind of behaviour is not in the Sealine spirit. Do you disagree? I mean the guy apologised to Chuck, eventhough Chuck never asked for one....what more would you like him to do ladies?
Interestingly, the angler (Chuck), has shrugged his shoulders and carried on, which shows that he is the bigger man. But what I see is some small minded guys that demand an apology for something that never even related to them. So, the apology comes and I'll give it to SS, most of you would not have manned up and apologised. So he did. But then, like a R20 hooker, you guys moan and moan like someone stole your lipstick! Jeez. You continue to attack the guy because the apology was not good enough. You want to humiliate him at all costs. Sealine belongs to everyone, not just to a select few and the site has an Admin that manages it.
Instead you guys resort to persecuting the man. (Persecution: systematic mistreatment of an individual by another individual or group - because I know most of you moaning old goats would not know what the word means). The fact is that this kind of behaviour is not in the Sealine spirit. Do you disagree? I mean the guy apologised to Chuck, eventhough Chuck never asked for one....what more would you like him to do ladies?
Blue Marlon
New member
I thought this was supposed to be the Sealine family....pwf__+
Blue Marlon wrote:
My point exactly.
Mike Smith
Sealiner
eish...........................
die weer is sekere regtig sleg, dis die dat die soapie so lank raak.
as almal se panties nou skoon is, en droog is, dan kan ons sekerlik aan beweeg!
die weer is sekere regtig sleg, dis die dat die soapie so lank raak.
as almal se panties nou skoon is, en droog is, dan kan ons sekerlik aan beweeg!
Mike Smith wrote:
Oom Mike is neet naar omdat Chucky in een outing meer vis gevang het as wat hy in n jaar vang.RobinF wrote:
Affiliation- when an individual shows a vested interest in another individual or organization and will protect that interest at all costs.
And I did not pull that one from Oxfords!
Sorry Ivan but that was my last say on this matter. Unwatch topic!