I would like to comment on a couple of posts which seemed to indicate that fishing close to Aliwal Shoal is in some way wrong or undesirable behaviour. I totally disagree with that sentiment.
Aliwal Shoal has been declared a protected area and the area where fishing is prohibited is very clearly defined, namely the area inside the contour at 25m depth. Based on how this protected are was defined, the intention of the conservation authorities is pretty clear to me: it is to relieve the pressure on the resident reef species, which will have a knock-on effect on the health of the Aliwal fishery as a whole. The authorities could have done something like protected the entire area from Umkomaas river mouth to Scottburgh, for example, but the fact that they didn't, means that their intention was to simply shift the pressure from the reef species to the pelagics that are drawn to the reef. To now state that fisherman should for some reason also ignore those pelagics is taking things a bit far in my opinion.
I think Aliwal is going to recover amazingly over the next few years and I think that we are going to see some excellent gamefish catches around the outside of the protected area as a result. For that very same reason I am very much in favour of declaring more marine protected areas offshore and also on the coastline. But for heaven's sake, allow fisherman to then use the areas adjacent to these sanctuaries and don't whine when they do. It's a win-win situation.
I think we must recognise how far we have come with instilling conservation-minded practices amongst sports fisherman. It's not so long ago that every fish that was hooked off a skiboat ended up in the hatch. I am also sorry to say that those practices do still occur, but at least it's not the norm any more, so let's at least acknowledge that. Considering that the fish taken on that ESA show were all of the tuna species, which is one of or least protected species, for the simple reason that they still enjoy a relatively healthy population size, I think the overall reaction of some posters on this thread was a bit over the top. I have also taken exception in the past when ESA have specifically targeted huge tuna on very light tackle, because you can really have only one outcome to that scenario, namely a dead fish, but in this case I don't think they were acting irresponsibly.