I  would like to know,why the boatbuilding in

qglass

New member
I  would like to know,why the boatbuilding in South Africa is not regulated,by an specefic board or organization, that issues licenses to manufacturers, to build boats.

That will resolve the issue ,about inferior products and quality,and surely there will be more happy customers out there.

Any opinions on the subject? AT THE MOMENT IT IS AN FREE FOR ALL

 
 
If you buy a scooter and it goes wrong, you can contact the agent but there is no "body" as such just like with boats. What you can do if you do not come right is take legal action against the manufacturer.
 

Patrick

Sealiner
The Consumer Protection Act is supposed to now protect you from any supplier of a product. All companies have had to, or are supposed to have adjusted their liability insurance when the act came into effect.
But lodging a complaint with someone who transgresses the CPA doesnt seem to be an easy thing. There is very little info out there for the average Joe on how to.

I agree, there should be a body of some sort. The insurance industry that i am in, and all financial sectors, are strongly regulated. I've just had to write a tough board exam on protecting the financial interests of a client. Without passing the exam you arent fit and proper to be able to trade. But what's the difference if you sell a client a dodgy policy or a boat of poor quality or no delivery (as in the case of the Kreef bakkies thread)? Either way the client is losing his money.
 

BFC

Senior Member
Totally agree there should be some sort of industry approval / managing body.

But this is a can of worms with many different components.

*) Design

*) Materials

*) Construction Method - recipe of different materials from different suppliers

Most of SA's Powerboats revolve around outboard dealerships and they in return take up some of the slack on warrantee's in conjunction with their boat suppliers

This also doubles up on a selection process ( if dealers stock a certain boat it would have passed a few criteria- or should have).

If we read about bad deals 80% of them are from builders direct ( either in prototype or early production phase)  the kreefbakkie / KC520/ Twister 720 spring to mind and the major reason being Cashflow for the builder.

Dealing directly with a builder the deal is negotiated for a un-built boat , with a dealership the deal is negotiated mostly with a completed boat.

Very interresting topic and would like to hear some more views on how such governing body should look in terms of composition ( engineers, designers, material fundi's etc).
 

FishExcutnr

Sealiner
When chatting to len (kamassi)the other day, they have to follow some kind of strict european standard when building boats, as they are exporting boats to australia which has very strict boating building standards. Will try find out what this standard is called.
 

FishExcutnr

Sealiner
The worst cases are cash flow from the builder..

many other boating cases in SA are non intentional just teething issues. Often the first boats to come out in a new design have some major issues, oopsy, did not think about that, or, dam that deck is too low. Thing is its to expensive to make experimental models, so when you buy a new model ( one of the first few boats), you take a risk,  the builder often offfers you a substancial discount to counter the risk.
BFC wrote:
Totally agree there should be some sort of industry approval / managing body.

But this is a can of worms with many different components.

*) Design

*) Materials

*) Construction Method - recipe of different materials from different suppliers

Most of SA's Powerboats revolve around outboard dealerships and they in return take up some of the slack on warrantee's in conjunction with their boat suppliers

This also doubles up on a selection process ( if dealers stock a certain boat it would have passed a few criteria- or should have).

If we read about bad deals 80% of them are from builders direct ( either in prototype or early production phase)  the kreefbakkie / KC520/ Twister 720 spring to mind and the major reason being Cashflow for the builder.

Dealing directly with a builder the deal is negotiated for a un-built boat , with a dealership the deal is negotiated mostly with a completed boat.

Very interresting topic and would like to hear some more views on how such governing body should look in terms of composition ( engineers, designers, material fundi's etc).
 

BFC

Senior Member
FishExcutnr wrote:
The worst cases are cash flow from the builder..

many other boating cases in SA are non intentional just teething issues. Often the first boats to come out in a new design have some major issues, oopsy, did not think about that, or, dam that deck is too low. Thing is its to expensive to make experimental models, so when you buy a new model ( one of the first few boats), you take a risk,  the builder often offfers you a substancial discount to counter the risk.
BFC wrote:
Totally agree there should be some sort of industry approval / managing body.

But this is a can of worms with many different components.

*) Design

*) Materials

*) Construction Method - recipe of different materials from different suppliers

Most of SA's Powerboats revolve around outboard dealerships and they in return take up some of the slack on warrantee's in conjunction with their boat suppliers

This also doubles up on a selection process ( if dealers stock a certain boat it would have passed a few criteria- or should have).

If we read about bad deals 80% of them are from builders direct ( either in prototype or early production phase)  the kreefbakkie / KC520/ Twister 720 spring to mind and the major reason being Cashflow for the builder.

Dealing directly with a builder the deal is negotiated for a un-built boat , with a dealership the deal is negotiated mostly with a completed boat.

Very interresting topic and would like to hear some more views on how such governing body should look in terms of composition ( engineers, designers, material fundi's etc).

Totally agree, the cost of designing and building a boat from scratch is astronomical .

Just to give an idea: My AceCraft project stands as follow,

1) Buying the moulds from Pitts Marine - R10k. + direct transport costs R7k

2) Realizing before building the first old style ACE the moulds has to be upgraded( saved R60k) - building a old boat with limited marketability =drain on cashflow.

3) Upgrading deck plug - R23k ( biggest cost =labour)

4) Deck Mould - R12k

5) Console Plug + Mould - R6k

6) Seat / livewell/ bait station - R6k

7) Gunnel Rod holder cut out mould - R3k

So a R10k mould set has now sucked R67k in total , But believe me its much cheaper doing it right than doing it wrong and this is a mould set of a boat with a very good and proven reputation. Luckily I see this as a hobby project of passion but if my livelyhood depended on it I would have been bunkrupt already , time , detail , carefull planning is the best attributes that can go into a boat.

Designing and building a demo Hull from Scratch can cost as much as R300k and that is a big capital risk to carry, if its as flop you start over. Point being putting a new boat on the market without the neccesary resourses is skating on thin Ice to begin with. see attached is a picture of such a design that is actually a very good boat but just does not work in SA, but very popular in USA ( almost 60 units running around in New England States VT/MA/RI)

Now the marketing side of it is a whole new ball game, dealerships will not touch a boat they feel they cannot make at least 30-40% Markup on. The builder is doing exceptionally well if he makes 10-15% per unit. As bad as it sounds there is no real volume pull to cut corners on margins. Buying direct from the builder will give the consumer +- 20% discount on retail and the builder will be 10% better off than supplying dealerships, the moment this happens dealerships are not that interrested in selling such boats as it exposes their margins - and the vicious sircle continues.

The other danger factor is clients cancelling orders after a build has started and this really makes one , want to reach for a shotgun but the client is always right !!

The SA boat market is a very tough and opinionated market if you can make it in SA you will make it anywhere.:kaykak

 
 

Attachments

  • image28.jpg
    image28.jpg
    44.1 KB · Views: 158

Fanie

Sealiner
Be carefull what you wish for. The boating market in SA has been damaged enough.

If such regulations are implemented it means only 'registered' (at a yearly fee to gov) boat builders will be able to build boats. You will never see anything new developed because it will be too expensive.

Nobody can stop you from building your own. I doubt that boat builders building poor boats will survive long.

Don't we have have enough laws and rules already ?

Why do you ask Qglass ? Not selling enough :-D

I like free for all...
 

Fin-S

Sealiner
But there are:
MIASA
Boating Industry Association of Southern Africa
Cape Town Boat Building and Technology Initiative

The question is whether the builders want to belong them....
 

dugongboy

Sealiner
I sort of agree with Fanie, poor quality usually gets found out, I remember there was a cat that had some issues a few years back and the sales took a knock - the builder had to sort it out, which he'd did! But even the well known have issues, I know of a boat built recently by M.......... That has had some serious quality issues, potential buyers get to hear of it and look elsewhere.
My advice is to try and check in on the build, and try and get all promises in writing/email.
 

BFC

Senior Member
I thought Ski-Boat magazine was the ''boat quality '' protector - the Thuli Madonsela of the waves with their standardized testing methods.

Here are some standardized methods:

* They make the test pilot  get up @ 5/6 am and test in Durban at dawn. and CapeTown always gets the Sundowner tests.

* the boat always jumps out the water for a picture moment. If a boat cant jump it aint getting the thumbs up.

* They will not reveiw a boat that does not have ample storage space they all have that .

* Very Few (42ft Rodman / 40ft Butt Cat / 56ft Hateras ) can unfurtunately not be towed ''behind someones hi-lux'' to make a nice surflaunching boat in Mozambique

* Every boat is well designed and big  for it's size.

* Its unheard of to have a boat that does not jump on the plain they all do that.- see point 2

* towing is is always a pleasure

* The term Broaching is forbidden , like hailstorm is forbidden in Landbou Weekblad.

* It is no Coincedence that the boat tester is also part owner of a boat - see the latest issue - testing the 21ft V cat  by Heinrich Kleyn and the Skippers names on the boat also contains Heinrich Kleyn this is not dodgy its ''comitment'' to a boat. Times are tough and pickings are slim at the moment not every boat builder has 15k to fork out for a test + Travel expenses + Spending money - Boats need to be tested even if its their own  >>>>  mmmkkay !! ( Ons werk met wat ons het !!!)

 

Now I want to know? Do we want to disrupt this sphere of happyness and spice it up with a panel of people consisting of boring engineers , nerdy computer geeks and other variation of smarty pantses to provide real facts oh and dont forget a dash of   BEEEEE and Oh Gee. 

Noooooooooo !!:fbash

Its bad for business, a boat is a dream its friends , girls , bikini's , big fish , beer and adventure.

 
 

qglass

New member
Hi,Bennie,

i have no connections in the boating industry.The reason why i have asked the question,is i am also in the manufacturing game[aluminium],where our products,get tested to receive an S.A.B.S. mark of approval,get approved by aamsa and must apply to local municipal rules/quality,before i can sell my product.

To come back to my original question;if there are standards,i wont be sitting with an product[boat] that i am not happy with.

 
 

FishExcutnr

Sealiner
Hi guys

There is a difference between finishing standards and boat building stsndards. the build process of you boat had to follow a set of strict international rules. the finishing does not have any standard and varies dramatically from boat builder to b. builder, however most are pretty similar now in order to compete in a tight market, but you do pay for what you get, however once yoy start getting three piece and so in cnc cut moulds you gonna see some really well finished boats coming from original ugly duckling companies.

I feel for the guys producing boats under 5.5 m. its a bloody mission, you are married to the client for up to 8 months, the clients needs are just as custom and complicated as a guy buulding a ten metre rig and in the end you walk away with 20 - 30 k after a bloody mission. ask any boat buulder they dont like the smaller rigs. look at the mould market place, plenty small mono and cat moulds under 16ff changing hands. Its not good news for small boats but at the end of the day it survives simply on the greater demand for them thsn bigger boats.
 

barryfish

Senior Member
I think that all boats should be water tested to get seaworthy. Not perhaps for the really new builder build boats, but guys fit all kinds of motors and bit and pieces to boats, change placement of items consoles etc on various boats and not all these are successful and there should be a standard of operation of a boat to get a seaworthy.

I bought a old boat, took for seaworthy which was rubber stamped by having the correct safety gear my initial looking and checking all looks good, almost sank on first outing. bad repair by prev owner on removed trim tab screws,filled with white wood filler. anyway my point is...

This boat in my opinion was not seaworthy, however I was legally entitled to launch it?
 
You can either build one boat that costs R1mil or 2 boats that cost R500k or 3 boats that cost R333k. And that is pretty much what the market is like. The only difference is you now have 2 or 3 customers to deal with instead of only 1. Your turn over is the same and often the smaller quick turn around boats are what keeps the doors open by paying the bills while you spend months on end building "expensive" boats. One day that customer will want to sell his 16" boat and buy a R1mil rand boat.
 

Fanie

Sealiner
Perhaps the builders try to get away from small boats because that is the group where the most accidents are. In today's times it's never the operator's fault, the fault is always with the manufacturer and the product. You can check.

Imo, ski boats have become very boring. There are other considerations that may be more important to boaters than just to be the fastest. Their argument is it worked up to now... (but only because that is all that is available !)and it comes with a huge price tag.



There was a guy here that built cats, his workers finish a hull over a week period and worked only during the day. I'm actually surprised that his hulls never delaminated from monday to friday in five pieces :-( Most builders however does make a good job.

The restrictions wrt boat building is only about safety. Nobody can keep you from building a boat, but it becomes an issue if other's lives are at stake (nobody worries about your's if you're the builder ;-)



LOL, BFC, besides the 'jumping' boats, have you ever seen a boat tested in bad weather ? Noooo... the water is always flat. They SAY the boat is good in bad weather, but hey, what is bad weather ? How long is a string ? At least flat water is flat water everywhere eh :-D

He he he... I just have to say, a 5m skiboat is a LOT bigger than 5m if it is twice as high on the trailer. When you need a ladder to get in it's even bigger :-D

Well, bigger is better, if you don't believe me ask the wife ! (They know everything).
 

Fanie

Sealiner
qglass wrote:
Hi,Bennie,

i have no connections in the boating industry.The reason why i have asked the question,is i am also in the manufacturing game[aluminium],where our products,get tested to receive an S.A.B.S. mark of approval,get approved by aamsa and must apply to local municipal rules/quality,before i can sell my product.

To come back to my original question;if there are standards,i wont be sitting with an product[boat] that i am not happy with.

 

The SABS mark gets awarded to a product that does what it says it does.  The SABS trailer lights does what it says it does - untill week two then the lamp fittings are rusted and you have to replace them with LED lights, so...

Materials are also required to be manufactured according to certain standards.  Ie for any one to make a resin it better be very consistent in quality... imagine the glass cures only here and there because a batch.... :-o

 

There is a huge difference between the boats as designed by an engineer and the boats produced in factories. 

The engineer desigbed boat requires glass placed in a sequence and in certain directions to save material and aquire optimim strength.

Boat buildng shops use people that does not understand technical requirements hence the boat gets layered up with a lot of layers to aquire the same strength.  It comes out heavy and more expensive, but hey, that's what boats are.

Aluminum boats are designed, the parts cut and/or made and it can be fitted together one way or it won't work.  The welding of seams are critical and as far as I know there are some requirements so you won't get seam cracks etc, basically the work of an aluminum welding expert.  I'm not an aluminum boat fan, but I saw some discussions on another forum.

 

What boat do you have that you are not happy with ?  Is it an aluminum one ?
 
Top