Marthin wrote:
You may find it hard to believe , but do agree with you 100% if the relationship was between a Builder and Bonafide Client - car , boat etc
In this case it was not there was a partnership / intent either verbal or written where 1 party would build a prototype at cost and the other party will market handle the sales - Mid process this relationship soured and that makes this whole debakel unique circumstances, yet Escapade is still pleading he was just a client and not being completely honest.
It's not difficult... boat, car doesnt really matter.
Ferrari can use the car they built's photos as much as they want to advertise a certain model.
Once i have bought mine tho, they have to ask and receive written consent from me to use my pictures of MY car in their adverts. They can use the next one off the production line again till they sell that one to someone else, then same story.
You can definately not take pictures of a completed boat, and make as if you built the entire thing or even own it, if you only built a part of it. Especially not if half has been done over again.
You may find it hard to believe , but do agree with you 100% if the relationship was between a Builder and Bonafide Client - car , boat etc
In this case it was not there was a partnership / intent either verbal or written where 1 party would build a prototype at cost and the other party will market handle the sales - Mid process this relationship soured and that makes this whole debakel unique circumstances, yet Escapade is still pleading he was just a client and not being completely honest.



