Hi I have looked at both the letter, and the regs, and I am a bit confused?
The letter clearly states that it is addressing craft that remain within 1,000m of the shore. When I look at the regs this is applicable to craft less than 3m?
There is also no mention of the 1Nm? I am sure there are other steps in the KZN consultative process, but the regs you post -page 56 Item (2)- point to this limit for a craft under 3m. The letter also says nothing about ski's been classed as Type E but I think this is correct but have not seen an authoritative link with the 1Nm limit?. (I also don't know how the Jet ski guys with craft under 3m handle this one!?)
I am not advocating skis going great distances offshore, but its a pretty strong statement to threaten ALL ski fishermen with prosecution if it is not clearly stated in the regs. And I doubt whether the letter supercedes the Gazetted Regulations?
There is an item that follows - namely Item (3) on pg 56 that talks to non- motor driven craft under 7m -that presumably fall in the plus 3m to 7m range-and there is no mention of a limit here but correctly points to safety concerns such as built in buoyancy- foam etc -which most skis have today? I would assume that the average fishing ski today easily falls in this length range?
The regs set the National standard to be followed. From a safety point of view I am sure the letter is best practise and I would not advise against it at all, especially so for kayaks of less than 3m. But we also can't ignore that fact that the letter was a response to a clubs request for information as how best to advise their members.
If one wants a National standard one has to read the regs and also be led by them. Particularly on the safety side.
If you are going out too far you are putting yourself at risk, but if you are going out too far without the safety kit, or a ski that sinks!, then you are a RISK!?
